<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Says No Way to Giant-Screen Super Bowl Party at a Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onethingiknow.net/2007/02/02/nfl-says-no-way-to-giant-screen-super-bowl-party-at-a-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onethingiknow.net/2007/02/02/nfl-says-no-way-to-giant-screen-super-bowl-party-at-a-church/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://onethingiknow.net/2007/02/02/nfl-says-no-way-to-giant-screen-super-bowl-party-at-a-church/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s37651.gridserver.com/?p=571#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Greg:

Whether it is a church or any public gathering makes no difference to me.  I do not claim discrimination against the church in particular, rather I am exasperated by the pettiness of the NFL, whose actions in this case and others like it would seem to do more harm than good to its image.

There are quite a few stories out there about this issue, and discerning the truth can be difficult.  But the original story in the Indianapolis Star (which can be accessed on the site I reference above) has the following quotes, some of which are from the horse's mouth of an NFL spokesperson (so to speak):

"Churches in Indiana and across the country are scrapping traditional Super Bowl viewing parties in wake of the NFL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg:</p>
<p>Whether it is a church or any public gathering makes no difference to me.  I do not claim discrimination against the church in particular, rather I am exasperated by the pettiness of the NFL, whose actions in this case and others like it would seem to do more harm than good to its image.</p>
<p>There are quite a few stories out there about this issue, and discerning the truth can be difficult.  But the original story in the Indianapolis Star (which can be accessed on the site I reference above) has the following quotes, some of which are from the horse&#8217;s mouth of an NFL spokesperson (so to speak):</p>
<p>&#8220;Churches in Indiana and across the country are scrapping traditional Super Bowl viewing parties in wake of the NFL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregA</title>
		<link>http://onethingiknow.net/2007/02/02/nfl-says-no-way-to-giant-screen-super-bowl-party-at-a-church/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>GregA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s37651.gridserver.com/?p=571#comment-298</guid>
		<description>There are extraordinary factual errors with this article.  The claim of discrimination is particularly disturbing.  Sports bars pay a public performance fee, Churches do not.

When you factor that in, the whole chrisitan argument on this issue falls appart into foolishness.

But please don't let the facts get in the way of your argument.

Pirate Away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are extraordinary factual errors with this article.  The claim of discrimination is particularly disturbing.  Sports bars pay a public performance fee, Churches do not.</p>
<p>When you factor that in, the whole chrisitan argument on this issue falls appart into foolishness.</p>
<p>But please don&#8217;t let the facts get in the way of your argument.</p>
<p>Pirate Away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://onethingiknow.net/2007/02/02/nfl-says-no-way-to-giant-screen-super-bowl-party-at-a-church/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s37651.gridserver.com/?p=571#comment-297</guid>
		<description>This was on digg, man the NFL is mean! &#62;:-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was on digg, man the NFL is mean! &gt;:-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
